Christian History Course

This is a collection of essays and course information from the Christian History Course offered by the Universal Life Church Seminary. We have essays and lesson information.

Thursday, May 17, 2012

Christian History

What makes the personality and character of Jesus Christ special
 
The personality and characteristics of Jesus Christ where unique or profoundly original this is to say they was different from other teachers and preachers of the day as of Jewish descent he was brought up with the teachings of the old testament as with rabbis of the day Jesus had his own interpretation of  life which is he believed we should follow the law of the land along with his teachings of brotherly love, when questioned by his followers he would use the phrase "I would say" this would be giving a direct approach and made him original in thought.

Another aspect of his personality and characteristics is that he was observant both as a child and in manhood this could be from his early years of being in Nazareth which is a major trade route, this would have been ideal for learning about life outside of his own world by listening to conversation and conversing with the populace and asking questions ,Luke2:52 tells us Jesus grew in body and mind. Could this mean Jesus was also outgoing at an early age for him to be able to develop his communication skills ready for his teachings.
John4 showed another original approach with Jesus in his discussion with the woman at the well in this he shows his ministry is open too all regardless of gender this included none Jews alike.

The best attributes to his personality was the sermon on the mount by not just following the law he embraced it thus showing compassion for all mankind and not just Judaism this was added to his preaching and healing abilities, this must have been a wondrous experience as oppose to a person just reading form a scroll.

What we have is a unique young man who developed his skills at an early age and as such was full of confidence but also compassion which gave us a teacher who was willing to give his time explaining the old testament and answer new question along with being a healer of the sick and able to run a seminary ( teach his disciples).
 

Master of Christian History Lesson # 2


Answers to Questions lesson # 2

1.    How do we know that Jesus Christ is a historical person and what are the historical evidences?

The gospel writers Luke (1:1-4) and John (20:30-31) made known that Christianity is a historical religion. Christianity cannot be apart from the Christ of history. The great Roman historian Tacitus (A.D. 55-A.D. 117) associated the name and beginnings of Christianity with "Christus" who in the Emperor Tiberius' reign was executed under the judgment of Pontius Pilate, the Procurator. Lucian (c. A.D. 125-c. A.D. 190) around A.D. 170 wrote a satire on Christians and the Christian faith. Lucian wrote that Christ was crucified for starting a new cult. He also wrote that the Christians believed that Christ taught them that they were brothers and ought to obey His laws. He further mocked them for bowing down to a crucified sophist.

These witnesses by the pagans are greatly important as historical evidence because they come from cultured Romans who generally mocked Christianity. On this foundation, in addition to the Bible which is also a historical writing, Christ did historically exist.

Flavius Josephus (c. A.D. 37-c. A.D. 100), a rich Jew who attempted to defend Judaism to the cultured Romans in his writings, mentioned Christ. He mentioned James the brother of Jesus who was assumed to be Christ. Josephus thought of Christ as a man of wisdom who was condemned to die on a Roman cross by Pilate. Josephus was not friendly toward Christianity. As such his mentioning of Christ garners more historical importance.

Other Evidence

Numerous apocryphal gospels, acts, epistles, and apocalypses are founded upon the historical existence of Christ. Inscriptions and pictures of the dove, the fish, the anchor, and many other Christian symbols in the Roman catacombs offer evidence to the belief in a historical Christ in addition to the existence of the Christian calendar, Sunday as the day of Christian worship, and the Christian church itself.

2.    What makes the personality and character of Jesus Christ special?                                

Holy Scripture offers some points on the personality and character of Jesus Christ. In reading the Gospels, Jesus has a profound originality. When Jewish and other authorities quote others as authorities for sundry statements, Jesus basically gave the phrase "I say." These occurrences in the Gospels show Jesus' original, creative thought which amazed the people of His day (Mark 1:22; Luke 4:32). Jesus' genuineness is very apparent in the scriptural record. Jesus was the only person on earth that had nothing to hide and could be completely Himself (John 8:46). The Gospels also bear witness to Jesus' balanced character. There was no excess in Jesus' character. This can only be sufficiently explained by the historical account of Jesus' Virgin Birth.

 

3.    How does Christ's person and work constitute the beginning of Christianity?

The awe-inspiring importance of Christ's personality is not separate from His work.

The death and bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ, along with His character, work, and teachings, constitute the beginning of Christianity.
Rev. Dr. John W. Hyland
Universal Life Church




Wednesday, May 16, 2012

Master of christian history lesson 13


 
 What set the post-Nicene fathers apart from the ante-Nicene fathers?

The Ante-Nicene fathers, are the Church Fathers who worked before the Council of Nicaea regardless of whether they were apostolic fathers, apologists, or polemicists. They studied the Scriptures in a more or less scientific way to gain theological meaning.

While the Post-Nicene Fathers which include the Eastern Post-Nicene Fathers and Western Post-Nicene Fathers are the Fathers of the church who were part of the schools of Biblical interpretation.

Rev. Andrew


Monday, May 14, 2012

Christian Ethics from ULC

Christian Ethics – Lessons 1 & 2  Homework questions
 
1.           Christian Ethics is a proper study of Jesus' life and teaching, and the knowledge gained applied to personal and social problems as they arise in day to day life.
 
2. Agape love is the love that transcends all, and is given willingly and completely by a person to another without thought of anything in return.
 
3.           Christendom means those areas and countries of the world which have accepted the Christian ideal and accepted its influence.
 
4.           The Church, provided it is faithful to its mission of preaching the Gospel and is a fellowship of those trying to follow the teachings of Christ, should be more aware of what is right more than the society surrounding it. This enables it to proclaim  the principles of Christian morality.
 
5.           The Bible is the fountainhead of Christian theology.
 
6.           The Old Testament should provide us with guidance on how to proceed in ethical situations, but should be taken in conjunction with the New Testament and Jesus; moral insights as provided therein.
 
7.           The New Testament gives us the historical revelation of God in Christ.
 
8.           True.
 
9.True
 
10.  As defined in Lesson 2, Christian Ethics is the study of the way of life set out by Jesus Christ and applied to the demands and decisions of our own personal and social lives.
 
 
 
 
 

Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Life of St. Paul Course through ULC

Final Essay – Master of the Life of St Paul
 
I have found this course to be both interesting and challenging and I feel that Rev Walter Moline has provided a very clear and concise rendering of St Paul's life and journeyings. All the happenings have been placed in the right order with very keen comments on the various aspects of his story with all the relevant Biblical course references.  A very useful aspect of the course were the question and answer sessions provided at the end of some of the lessons which enabled one to test the knowledge that had been gained.
 
Right from the beginning, Paul was to discover that the way of Christianity was not going to be easy, and, in fact, Jesus had already indicated that Paul was going to have to suffer many things for the faith. After the shock of meeting Jesus on the road to Damascus and the three days of blindness that he had to suffer before he was free to mix with, and learn from the saints in Damascus, Paul underwent a period in the desert outside Damascus learning the lessons that the disciples of Jesus had learned before. He learned direct from God on a one-to-one basis and in the quiet of the desert situation rather than in the way the original disciples had received their lessons in the day to day teaching with Jesus. I feel that Paul was given in the course of his desert time a more open and direct teaching to enable him to use his talents to take the Gospel to the Gentiles although he did not neglect to preach the same Gospel firstly to the Jews who would accept his word.
 
A further lesson that Paul had to learn was that the Jews were not going to let him preach the new faith without trying to stop him and this extended even to stoning him in Lystra in an attempt to kill him. Fortunately, he survived to continue his work but even so had to continually fight against Jewish Christian opinion in his attempts to bring the Gospel of 'free salvation' to the Gentiles. Some of his opponents were Pharisee converts to the faith who insisted that the force of Jewish Law should be imposed upon Gentile Christians. One can imagine how these Pharisees would behave when one thinks about the problems with them that Jesus had to contend with during his ministry. The fact that they had become converts to the Christian faith did not relieve them from sticking to the Jewish Law in its entirety. One wonders whether in fact it could be possible for any of the Pharisees mentioned to have been instrumental in the death of Christ. Fortunately, Paul's eloquence before the Jerusalem Council won the day, but this was not the end of his struggles to bring the faith to as many people as possible. Time and time again his teaching brought him into conflict with those who felt that only through adherence to the Law of Moses could Gentiles be accepted into the faith. However, the full support he gained from the Church in Jerusalem allowed him to admit Gentiles by faith, repentance and baptism in the name of Christ.
 
We have become used to dissensions and differences over the centuries of the Christian faith and note that these differences started within a few years of Christ's ascension and have continued on and off ever since. Even Paul had his disagreements with Barnabas resulting in the pair splitting up and going their separate ways. While in some ways this was regrettable, one could possibly see the hand of God in it in that there were now two teams going to different areas and proclaiming the Gospel. This indeed would enable the Gospel to be spread further and faster than would have been possible if Paul and Barnabas had stayed together. So, in some ways, good had come out of this disagreement.
 
It was obvious that God was with Paul and protected his chosen Apostle, giving him support and strength to carry on with the work, as well as faithful support from his companions, ensuring that the faith was brought eventually to Rome.  It was not without various problems, fears and hardships throughout his journeyings, but Paul, in turn, had a profound trust in God which enabled him to carry on his work despite all the difficulties and dangers he encountered.
 
St Paul sets a good example to all Christians in his faith and works being fully dependent on the Lord who showed him the way that he should go and, more importantly, that God was always with him to direct his footsteps and give him the words to say when challenged about his message. He was not afraid to go to Jerusalem even though he might be killed there or to go to Rome, the then centre of the known world, to preach his message. He fully trusted in God to guide and protect him until he had done the work for which he had been called. He would then be happy and content to die for Christ.
 
The last five lessons deal with aspects of Christianity that are essential to a true believer. They provide basic information on the main aspects of the faith and provide the seeker with biblical references to support the points raised. We need to have some direction in our aspects of worship and both Old and New Testaments provide this background. Much of the supporting information comes from St Paul's letters and these are directly relevant to our daily life in Christ. We are all sinners to one degree or another in that all require at some points in our lives both to forgive and to be forgiven. To the Christian this is most important as to be unforgiving separates us from God and Christ, as Jesus pointed out to Peter that we should forgive our brothers not just seven times but seventy times seven ie always!!
 
The doctrine of the Trinity is one of the most complicated of the Christian doctrines, in that it is made difficult to understand by theologians who seek to find hidden depths of meaning which may or may not exist, but confuse the ordinary person who seeks a simple but close association and understanding with God. My view, as a Christian, is that God is the Father (as Jesus said) of all of us but Jesus is the human part of God who was sent from God to live a mortal life and by His teaching to bring God's truth to humanity, and to provide through His death and resurrection a way to conquer sin and death and Satan for ever. After His resurrection, Jesus was taken up into heaven after appearing to His disciples to prove that he was alive again, to become part of God again and to enable Him to send down the Holy Spirit, the third part of the Trinity, to provide support for the apostles and others continually in teaching the faith. The Trinity is all one Person comprising three parts forming the whole. This may be very simplistic but provides a way of understanding this doctrine without delving too deeply into matters which are beyond many of us. It may also be as well to remember that perhaps we are not meant to fully understand this doctrine in this earthly life as this may be a truth that will be revealed in the life hereafter.
 
Lesson 20 deals with Spiritual Gifts, a subject which is important to the Christian because God has given us all gifts of one sort or another, some small and some large, to use to help all with whom we come into contact in our daily lives. If we do not use these gifts that we have been given, then no doubt we shall lose them and we will be the poorer for it. These gifts are to be used with love, without any distinction between individuals and without thought of receiving anything in return.
 
As I said at the beginning, I have found this course very interesting and informative and can highly recommend it to anyone seeking to understand the life of one of the greatest of Christian saints who went from being a violent opponent of Christianity to being one of the  most enthusiastic of its supporters.
 
Rev Derek Kemp
 
 
 

Thursday, May 3, 2012

Four Gospels Book of John


In The Four Gospels Seminary Course, I am selecting to write about "The Word According To John," since this is one of my favorite books of the Bible. I must admit that I learned just as much from the interesting emails as I did from the book itself. The analyses which Amy has provided bring new insights into each book and the book also provides new ideas simply by the way it has been translated. So many of our holidays today have been derived from the "Holy Days" described in the chapters of The Unvarnished Gospels.  It is fascinating that so many of our traditions and rituals have not changed much in over 2000 years.

The Book of John seems to contradict itself (as well as contradicting the other Gospels in several areas) as one proceeds through the chapters. While there ARE contradictions in other books about Jesus and/or what He did during his lifetime here on Earth, John seems to bring about more than other books. Perhaps the way it seems to be more "preachy" (where the voice it is written in seems more dictatorial) makes it appear quite different from the other three books. John does have an easier feel to the actual reading, but provides much more material for discussion since it doesn't agree with the other books as much regarding what and/or how Jesus did things. In The Unvarnished Gospels, the other three books seem to agree with each other in most instances in sharp contrast to John.

John has in some chapters a "polarized" feel to it where he writes something that is opposite to or goes against what he wrote in a previous chapter. It is quite plausible that some of the items in question may be disputable due to the amount of time which had
passed between the actual events and the time that John was actually written. For instance, many stories change over time; becoming more grand and/or distorted with each telling. As a result, since it seems that John was written without the author actually witnessing the events as they unfolded, it becomes seemingly obvious as to why so many situations and/or particulars contradict the other three Gospels and even some of John's own material. Someone who does not witness a particular event and is simply writing down what others say happened has a good chance of writing material which does not necessarily agree with what is already known about the event. In addition, since said person did not witness said event, they would not be averse to writing something in a later chapter which does not agree with what they wrote about in an earlier chapter.

By no means am I attempting to justify these issues which appear to be rather glaring mistakes; but I believe that it is rather easy for us to see these mistakes that we could just as easily have made ourselves were we to write the same type of material where the subject matter happened quite possibly before we were born or otherwise was not witnessed by us. Like the old saying goes, "Hindsight is 20/20." The real beauty of all four Gospels is that even today we can see for ourselves the spirits which exist within ourselves comprising the truth and all that is good which Jesus so desperately wanted all people to see and understand. The translation of this book does render it much easier to read as it replaces outdated or obsolete words with the language of today. It is a shame that so many Bibles use such outdated wording and phrases, as I believe this is what turns so many younger individuals off. Once a person has been "turned off" to reading the Bible, it becomes much more difficult to regain his or her interest. As such, this book in particular goes a long way towards making Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John a more pleasurable reading experience, even for someone who has already read all four books in the regular style.

Submitted by Erik Michaels